• D.C.
  • BXL
  • Lagos
  • Riyadh
  • Beijing
  • SG
  • D.C.
  • BXL
  • Lagos
Semafor Logo
  • Riyadh
  • Beijing
  • SG


icon

Semafor Signals

Panama disputes US claim of free canal crossings for government ships

Updated Feb 6, 2025, 12:23pm EST
South America
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the head of the Panama Canal administration.
Mark Schiefelbein/Pool via Reuters
PostEmailWhatsapp
Title icon

The News

Panama pushed back after the US State Department on Wednesday said government ships would be allowed to cross the Panama Canal for free.

The Panama Canal Authority rejected the claim, adding that it was ready to establish a dialogue with the US — the Authority governs the waterway independently and sets transit tolls.

AD

Since the US relinquished control of the waterway in 1999, Washington has paid some $25.4 million dollars to move US warships and submarines through the canal, according to official Panama figures. But very few US Navy vessels go through it — just 0.5% of annual traffic, according to canal officials. Free passage would save the Pentagon around $13 million; the Defense Department’s annual budget is $850 billion, The Wall Street Journal noted.

US President Donald Trump has repeatedly vowed to retake control of the canal — through which 40% of US container ships pass — citing China’s influence over the waterway as a national security threat.

icon

SIGNALS

Semafor Signals: Global insights on today's biggest stories.

Panama officials suspect US wants to ‘back them into a corner’

Source icon
Source:  
The Wall Street Journal

Panama had been privately assessing a potential deal to allow US Navy ships to transit through the canal for free when the State Department made its Wednesday announcement, leaving officials scrambling. The US “jumped the gun,” The Wall Street Journal wrote, with Panama officials seeing it as “a way to back them into a corner.” Allowing US government vessels free passage would mark a “significant concession” to Trump: The original treaty — negotiated by former President Jimmy Carter — governing the canal stipulates that no user can receive preferential treatment. If Panama does not concede, however, there is growing concern that Trump could use force: “We’re taking it back, or something very powerful is going to happen,” Trump said before Rubio’s visit.

Questions over China’s influence remain

Source icon
Sources:  
Americas Quarterly, BBC, The Guardian

That the Panama Canal is a point of sensitivity for US national security has been a “core principle” in Washington for much of the last century, Americas Quarterly editor-in-chief Brian Winter wrote. And while Panama’s president has repeatedly denied any Chinese influence over the canal, some experts believe Trump’s claims aren’t necessarily baseless: The two largest ports appending either end of the canal are run by a Hong Kong-based company, and any disruption there would “cripple” the ability of the US Navy to move resources around the world, Winter wrote. Meanwhile, Panama has pulled out of China’s Belt and Road Initiative and dialed back other ties to Beijing in recent days — moves welcomed by Washington.

AD