 Hi! The China-Africa debate in the political theater of Capitol Hill often requires a bingo card of clichés about the role of Chinese players on the continent. This week’s hearing at the US Senate’s Africa and Global Health Policy subcommittee was not that different, but it did get me thinking about what Washington believes it wants. On Wednesday Troy Fitrell, ostensibly the highest-placed US-Africa official, was on hand to respond to questions about “China’s malign influence” in Africa. “Greater US economic engagement is urgently needed to bolster African efforts to counter China’s growing influence on the African continent,” he told the hearing. Despite being the largest economy in the world with many of the biggest and most advanced enterprises globally, the US isn’t necessarily best placed to deliver on this promise. It doesn’t have the coordinating heft of a Chinese government with state-owned enterprises or significant influence over private companies. The irony, said Eric Olander, editor of the China Global South Project, is that even as it says it is countering malign influence, the Trump administration is proposing to follow the Chinese playbook on the continent by focusing on trade and commercial partnerships rather than humanitarian and health missions. Whether it can pull that off is one thing, whether African governments are able to navigate this in a way that benefits their citizens is a completely different matter. |