REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton Could Donald Trump’s opposition to climate policy cost him re-election? A new study suggests it just might. In an analysis of polling data from the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections, University of Colorado political scientist Matthew Burgess found that the importance voters ascribed to climate change was one of the strongest predictive factors of who they voted for, with higher concern favoring Democrats. Concern among Republicans, except among the most conservative, increased between the two elections. All else being equal, if the 2020 Republican candidate (Trump) had demonstrated more concern about climate change, he might have gained a 3% shift in the popular vote margin, which would have been enough to hand him the election, Burgess concludes. As it was, of the 2020 Republican voters for whom climate change was “very important,” about one-third voted for Biden. That’s only about 3.5% of total Republican voters, but in a close election that’s enough to matter, Burgess said. This year, “[climate] does seem likely to hurt him again,” he told me. One problem with this theory is that although two-thirds of Americans view addressing climate change as important, only about 10% rank it as their top concern, and only a minority are willing to accept costs — higher electricity rates, for example — that may stem from climate policy. As the political columnist Matt Yglesias observed recently, support for climate policy may be “a mile wide and an inch deep,” which suggests it may be a risky issue for Biden to focus his re-election campaign on. The key for capturing more of the borderline Republican climate voters, Burgess said, is a narrower message: They’re turned off by arguments about social justice, and motivated by climate policies that are “economically beneficial and sensitive to voters’ pocketbook concerns about inflation and energy prices; and framed in optimistic (as opposed to histrionic or millenarian), patriotic, and unifying ways.” For the general election, the biggest challenge for Democrats is to get voters for whom climate is a top priority to actually turn up to the polls, said Nathaniel Stinnett, executive director of the nonprofit Environmental Voter Project: “We’ve seen in our research that low-propensity voters are more likely to prioritize climate change than consistent voters, which reveals there’s a significant amount of potential political power in the climate movement that just hasn’t been activated yet.” |