THE SCOOP A former senior trader is still fighting hedge-fund giant D.E. Shaw in a case charged with the politics of the #MeToo movement on Wall Street that could also have repercussions for contracts throughout the industry. In a Tuesday filing at the New York Supreme Court, lawyers for Daniel Michalow say that D.E. Shaw’s policy, common among big funds, of withholding back pay until soon-to-be-ex-employees sign away their rights to sue the firm or report misconduct is illegal under New York state labor laws. Michalow was fired by D.E. Shaw in 2018 after telling a former assistant that he was looking for a new assistant whom he could call “sugar tits” — a quip he later said was intended as a Mel Gibson impression. The fund said his behavior violated the firm’s code of conduct. In 2022, he was awarded $52 million by a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority panel that found D.E. Shaw and four senior executives defamed Michalow when they suggested to a Bloomberg reporter, and internally, that he had been fired for sexual misconduct. Michalow, who originally sought $600 million in damages and deferred compensation, has been appealing the size of that award, arguing that D.E. Shaw is still holding back millions of dollars of his deferred pay based on a contract that isn’t strictly legal. In May, a New York judge rejected his efforts to get $14 million of that deferred compensation because he had refused to sign a required release. D.E. Shaw did not return a request for comment. THORNTON’S VIEW Michalow might not immediately cut a sympathetic figure. But his case shows how hedge funds’ secrecy can hamstring their employees’ attempts to preserve their own reputations. Hedge funds are micro-cultures and many of them are very protective of the secret sauce behind how they invest and trade. At quant funds like D.E. Shaw, which rely on proprietary algorithms, that furtiveness can verge on cultishness. Many funds have tightened their employment contracts to make it harder for traders to take those secrets with them to a competitor, using things like deferred compensation as a cudgel. They often recruit straight out of universities and business schools, offering huge sums of money to young people unfamiliar with employment contracts. (Michalow says he signed on with D.E Shaw as an undergraduate.) He has an axe to grind, but it’s also clear that the “release-for-pay” issue is not just a D.E. Shaw problem. |