Flightless In London Zoo, there is a Penguin Pool. It was designed in 1934 by the architect Berthold Lubetkin, a Soviet emigré influenced by Le Corbusier, and is beautiful: A “geometrically balanced, elliptical structure,” built around a “pair of gracefully interlocking, miraculously unsupported spiral ramps.” It is renowned as a masterpiece of modernism, and much celebrated by architects. Unfortunately, Ian Leslie notes in The Ruffian, it “hasn’t had any penguins in it for twenty years.” Its concrete floors gave the penguins arthritis; its foot-deep pool didn’t let them dive; its echoey walls messed with the penguins’ ability to identify each others’ unique calls. They didn’t slide down the showpiece spiral ramps, and if they had they’d have slid into a wall. The problem was that Lubetkin had designed it as a metaphor for Antarctica, rather than an attempt to recreate the penguins’ actual habitat, and “as it turns out, it’s not much fun for an animal to live in a human metaphor.” Nowadays, zoos are much more focused on “what makes the animals happy, rather than what humans find amusing.” Half life A funny thing about support for nuclear power, at least in Britain: It’s not that popular, except in places where nuclear power plants used to be. When the political bloggers and think-tankers Jeremy Driver and Ben Hopkinson polled 2,000 people on whether they’d support building new nuclear plants in their area, about 50% said yes, compared to more than 70% for renewables. But in Anglesey, where the Wylfa nuclear plant shut down in 2015, residents “speak with a genuine misty-eyed fondness of the well-paid jobs and opportunities that nuclear power provided.” The plant brought good local jobs and a well-paid workforce that spent money in the area: “Many of the benefits of nuclear generation are felt most strongly by the local communities.” But in Britain, as in the United States, the older generation of plants is shutting down, and fewer people remember those benefits. “It’s very possible that local support for nuclear power in places that previously had nuclear power generation has a half-life,” write Driver and Hopkinson, “and will begin to fade the longer we wait to replace it.” Market towns A lot of people strongly dislike “market rate” housing. That is: Letting developers build homes and sell them at a price that people are willing to pay. With cities across the West facing housing crises, and millions unable to afford to rent or buy, it seems to those people that making more houses to rent or buy at those unaffordable prices won’t help. But it will, says the economics blogger Noah Smith: Building expensive homes in a city will make housing more affordable. It shouldn’t even be a controversial point, he argues: It’s economics 101. If you have a town of 10,000 people, and 10,000 Honda Civics for sale, and then you offer a Lamborghini for $300,000, then when someone buys the Lambo, there are 10,000 Civics for 9,999 people and someone’s going to have to drop the sticker price on the last Civic. The price of the average car has gone up — but the Civics have become more affordable. Similarly, it’s been shown empirically that when fancy new homes become available, people who can afford them move into them, freeing up cheaper accommodation down the ladder. |