I am the great Cornholio Recently, the long-running US late-night comedy staple Saturday Night Live ran a sketch. In fact it runs several every week, but for some reason this one attracted remarkable levels of attention. In it, Ryan Gosling and Mikey Day dressed up as Beavis and Butthead from Beavis and Butthead, the 1990s cartoon, and appeared in the audience, putting off the presenter. It was, says the culture blogger Vince Mancini, “everywhere … The amount of digital ink being devoted to … this sketch is nothing short of mind-boggling.” But why? It wasn’t, Mancini wrote in The #Content Report (and Flagship’s Tom agrees), particularly funny. It was okay, “kind of half-assed,” which is fine — lots of comedy is stupid and all the better for it — but not exactly groundbreaking. Does it need a 5,000-word Vanity Fair oral history? The only explanation, he says, is that it’s a psy-op by a foreign government. The whole thing is made even weirder by the fact that according to a HuffPost “scoop,” the sketch was six years in the making: “If I’d been sitting on an ‘actor wears funny wig’ concept for six years, you couldn’t beat that information out of me with a wet bamboo cane.” Booked out There’s been a big uproar in the literary scene over the sponsorship of book festivals. Hay and Edinburgh, two of the biggest British literary festivals, were both partly sponsored by an investment firm called Baillie Gifford. But activists complained that BG’s portfolio includes some fossil fuel firms, and after weeks of pressure, both festivals removed the company as a sponsor. That sounds like a win for the climate, but it’s not, argues Hannah Ritchie on Sustainability by Numbers. For one thing, while BG does have about $6 billion invested in fossil fuels, that’s only about 2% of its total portfolio, well below the industry average of 11%, and overall its climate record is pretty good. But for another, the world still needs fossil fuels, and will do for some decades. “I want to see the world massively increase its investments in clean energy, and I want us to transition away from fossil fuels,” writes Ritchie. “But the black-and-white ‘fossil fuels are evil’ narrative is not helping us to have grown-up conversations.” The fifty-first state The British general election draws near — it’s barely two weeks before what is expected to be a thorough trouncing for the incumbent Conservative Party. And as so often happens in British politics, British political commentators have got it all confused with American politics, writes the Oxford political scientist Ben Ansell. “Once upon a time you could just blame The West Wing,” he writes on Political Calculus. But that’s been off air for almost 20 years. Nonetheless, it keeps happening. To take one example: The Conservatives are warning that the opposition Labour Party could win a “supermajority” — but there’s no such thing in British parliamentary politics, which in all cases just requires a simple majority. “Just ask [former Prime Minister] Jim Callaghan, who lost a vote of no confidence by a single vote.” Labour could indeed win a very big majority, but that is not the same thing. It’s not Jed Bartlet et al any more, though: Britain’s political classes “have absorbed so much online US content” that they have started developing “America-brain.” |