Rojak is a colloquial Malay word for “eclectic mix,” and is the name for a Javanese dish that typically combines sliced fruit and vegetables with a spicy dressing. Xi the non-radical urbanist What does Xi Jinping think about urban planning? The question could serve as a lens to understand the Chinese leader’s views on governance. Researcher Andrew Stokols reviewed speeches Xi has given over the years, including some found at Xinhua Bookstore’s flagship branch in Beijing. He concluded that Xi’s views on urbanism and cities “can hardly be described as radical,” Stokols wrote in his newsletter Sinocities. Xi has criticized past government approaches that led to pollution, loss of local identity, flashy buildings, and overpriced housing. He’s promoted architecture with traditional Chinese culture and urban design that puts people’s experiences first. Xi also pushed for giving national bodies more clout than prefectures in city planning. That, Stokols wrote, parallels his larger philosophy of centralizing government power within the Chinese Communist Party. Ticket to ride India may just be the perfect country for a high-speed rail network. Given the massive size of its aviation market and the already-congested current rail infrastructure, there is an argument for short flights within the country to be replaced by bullet trains. That’s the case Kyle Chan makes in High Capacity, his newsletter about industrial policy focusing on India and China. Chan designed his own map for what a rail network would look like; a trip from New Delhi to Mumbai would take 4.5 hours, compared to 16 hours currently. Critics point to the high cost of building such a network, but Chan argued that railways shouldn’t be viewed as a “financial asset” with a direct return on investment. Instead, they drive the country’s broader development. Bullet trains “have the potential to transform India like its conventional railways did in the past. A country as large and rapidly developing as India needs to bet big on its future.” Manifestation station Humans have always wanted control over that which they cannot control. Today, many call it “manifesting,” the philosophy that thinking, writing, or saying something can will it into existence. In medieval England, people turned to “cunning” magicians, who were able to supernaturally assist others to find everything from love to missing kitchenware. Recently, the practice of manifesting has taken off, in part thanks to TikTok trends, along with using crystals to summon magical forces. But such craft is irrational and arguably harmful compared to the olden days of going to a magician for help, Brian Klaas argues in his newsletter The Garden of Forking Paths. The medieval guides worked in collective belief, rather than the individualistic nature of today’s manifestation: “The underlying premise can create a philosophical justification for blaming victims of oppressive social systems. Poor? Should’ve manifested riches!” |