Crime writing Kamala Harris could well be the next US president, as you’ll have read in the items above. So maybe it’s a good time to read this review, from last year, of her 2009 book Smart on Crime. Matthew Yglesias, who was skeptical of her appointment as vice president, said he “was really pretty impressed by this book.” It’s not the greatest book on crime control, but given that it was written by a high-profile politician on a hot-button issue, “it’s remarkably good.” Crucially, it was written during the then-prosecutor’s run to be California’s attorney general, and she had to reassure voters she wasn’t “some Bay Area lunatic.” So “the book reflects an old-school, tough-on-crime ethic,” advocating zero tolerance for gang activity and talking about the impact of crime on low-income neighborhoods. Opponents quoted from it as evidence she was an awkward fit for a progressive candidate, but those sentiments are popular with voters: “She would do well to re-read it and have all her current advisors read it,” Yglesias said, “and think about how to tap into these ideas and the place they came from.” London calling You may remember there was an election in Britain a few weeks ago. No one really does, even in Britain, because it was very low drama: The opposition was obviously going to win heavily; it won heavily; the end. The US election is a lot more exciting and everyone’s looking at it, like the distracted boyfriend meme. But it does mean the country has a new government with a strong mandate and a lot of political capital, and it has swiftly begun making changes. In particular, Prime Minister Keir Starmer wants to get Britain building to fire up its lagging economy. The economics-focused writer Sam Bowman is impressed, so far. The Labour Party “grasps how important it is to fix housing,” he writes — which represents a remarkable victory for the nascent YIMBY movement. It will build more infrastructure, too. But he worries that the government lacks ambition in just trying to build 1.5 million new homes: “Cambridge and Oxford … could probably grow by 10-20 times. London might double in population size if we let it.” He calls for the government to take the shackles off and end up with 20 million Londoners. Wiki wiki wild wild west Maybe not everyone gets very excited about Wikipedia edit histories. But the site is the closest humanity has to a repository of all its knowledge, and the ins and outs of what counts as a Wikipedia fact may be boring, but it matters. The pseudonymous writer Tracing Woodgrains examines the influence of one man, David Gerard, on deciding what counts as a “reliable source” — “Few people have had more of a hand than him in shaping the site.” Some news sources are banned, and others are not, on the strength of his say-so. Gerard describes himself as the Forrest Gump of the internet, present at every major event, “and honestly, I can’t particularly disagree,” says Woodgrains. But his story is a “tragedy,” in which a once bright-eyed enthusiast for the power of internet truth and openness ended up with him “launder[ing] his grudges into the public record,” filtering his opinions via other people’s work to circumvent Wikipedia’s ban on original sources. “Gerard had found the most Reliable Source of all: himself.” |