Making reservations The late chef and food documentarian Anthony Bourdain visited Ukraine in 2011, before not only this latest full-scale invasion but the annexation of Crimea that preceded it. Then, a visit to Kyiv showcased “borsch, vodka, and nostalgia for the Soviet victory over Nazi Germany,” The Counteroffensive’s Tim Mak writes. “Whether through music, language, and food, Ukraine today defines itself on its own terms, rather than in relation to Russia and its colonial history.” Of the three places Bourdain visited, two are closed. But if he could re-record in Kyiv today, “it is safe to say this hypothetical new episode would reflect the Ukrainian identity surging throughout the country.” Tech developments Generative AI has captured so much attention, it can be easy to ignore powerful developments triggered by more mundane technology. In Pakistan, what is commonplace in richer countries is helping villages connect to what can feel like a faraway government. Patients get access to more specialized medical care by connecting to doctors online and schools teach students about climate change, thanks to the building of better internet infrastructure. “Less cutting-edge technology is also proving pivotal in advancing development around the world,” Interweave, a newsletter focused on the use of tech in government, noted. Risky business The recent release of Oppenheimer has spurred multiple comparisons between the nuclear moment and efforts to corral and regulate artificial intelligence. But while similarities between the two technologies are instructive, so are their differences, Robert Wright notes in Nonzero. AI is “much harder to control than nuclear weapons,” Wright argues, its destructive outcomes “are less obviously devastating but are more complex,” and research, development, and deployment is largely being handled by private companies and nonstate actors. “This unruliness, combined with the amount of destructive potential AI does have, gives it a uniquely disturbing risk profile.” |