Mike Segar/Reuters US vice-presidential candidates Tim Walz and JD Vance faced off in a debate that most observers felt the Republican won, but which will likely have little direct impact on the election. Vance’s “confidence and fluency” stood out, although he dodged questions about whether Donald Trump lost in 2020 and was on the back foot over abortion rights, Edward Luce wrote in the Financial Times. Vice-presidential debates rarely matter — in 1988, Republican Dan Quayle was humiliated, but entered the White House nonetheless. This debate could, however, reveal what the Republican Party will look like after Trump: Vance, at 40, may be the party’s future, Luce wrote, a “tempered and reasonable” voice that “conveyed Trumpism in its palatable form.” |