The field of “misinformation research” has grown rapidly, but there is little consensus on what “misinformation” actually means. Perhaps just 0.15% of most US consumers’ media diet is outright made up, Science reported. Misleading information is more common, but defining that is difficult. Also, researchers tend to be politically left-leaning, and right-wing material is much more likely to be labeled misinformation, which “can appear politically motivated.” The philosopher Dan Williams noted this year that expansive definitions of misinformation, such as “facts in a misleading context,” allow researchers to use it to describe almost anything — and that their judgments, like everyone else’s, are “corrupted by bias, partisanship, wishful thinking, and more.” |