Sudan conflict threatens humanitarian crisis as thousands of Africans flee

Nigerian authorities on Monday said they were working to evacuate some of the country’s 5,000 citizens stranded in Sudan. Meanwhile, Uganda said it had evacuated more than 200 of its nationals by getting them on to buses traveling via Ethiopia.

Zimbabwe has moved its nationals from Khartoum to the Port of Sudan from where transport arrangements were being made to get them back to the southern African country, a government spokesman said.

The fight will likely leave thousands of people in need of food and shelter both inside the country and in neighboring countries.

“If this does devolve into a nationwide civil war…we’re looking at a regional humanitarian catastrophe [with] refugees flowing into Chad, South Sudan, Egypt, Ethiopia,” Ben Hunter, Africa analyst at risk intelligence company Verisk Maplecroft, told me. “None of these are countries which have the infrastructure and money to look after these people,” he said.

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced late on Monday a 72-hour ceasefire to enable safe evacuations and the provision of humanitarian assistance.

But even if the latest ceasefire holds — unlike previous attempts — prolonged fighting still seems likely. That’s because a range of outside actors — including Egypt, Libya, and Gulf states — are backing sides in the conflict to pursue their own strategic interests in the mineral-rich north-east African country. Their interventions will make it harder to end the fighting.

Blinken warned on Monday that Russia’s Kremlin-linked Wagner Group risked aggravating Sudan’s conflict.

Kenya’s top diplomat, speaking at the joint press conference, criticized the involvement of Middle Eastern powers. Alfred Mutua, Kenya’s cabinet secretary for foreign and diaspora affairs, called for “an African solution to African problems.”

“We can’t effectively do that if we are talking to groups that are being strengthened every day by the parties who believe that all they need to do is to fight to the end,” he said.

The self interest of various countries means Mutua’s plea is likely to fall on deaf ears. Meanwhile, Horn of Africa countries that could end up hosting refugees are on the brink of famine following five consecutive failed rainy seasons and supply chain shocks stemming from the war in Ukraine and the COVID-19 pandemic.

Michael Shurkin, senior fellow at the Atlantic Council U.S. think tank, cautioned against assuming there would be a large-scale humanitarian crisis because international aid agencies already have a longstanding presence in the region.

“There are resources in place and mechanisms for dealing with mass displacement because there are NGOs everywhere,” said Shurkin. He compared the situation to the Syrian civil war that forced the creation of refugee camps in countries where aid agencies previously were not found, such as Turkey and Jordan.

“The infrastructure might already be in place” in areas hit by conflict in recent decades, he said, citing South Sudan, Chad and Sudan’s Darfur region.

Peter Ajak, a former South Sudanese government official, said the ability of the Sudanese to grow crops will be “substantially reduced,” which would affect both countries since South Sudan relies heavily on imports from its northern neighbor.

Ajak said the situation in South Sudan “was already horrible with millions of people in need of humanitarian assistance,” after years of intercommunal violence in different parts of the country. “Now, with the extra influx of population from the north I think it’s just going to be absolutely horrific.”