• D.C.
  • BXL
  • Lagos
  • Dubai
  • Beijing
  • SG
rotating globe
  • D.C.
  • BXL
  • Lagos
Semafor Logo
  • Dubai
  • Beijing
  • SG


In today’s edition, we look at how firms like Microsoft and Google are lying on old playbooks, which͏‌  ͏‌  ͏‌  ͏‌  ͏‌  ͏‌ 
 
rotating globe
March 20, 2024
semafor

Technology

Technology
Sign up for our free newsletters
 
Reed Albergotti
Reed Albergotti

Hi, and welcome back to Semafor Tech.

I was working in a San Francisco coffee shop yesterday and thinking about Microsoft’s not-quite-acquisition of Inflection AI when I looked around me.

The person across from me was discussing his AI drug discovery company. A group of people at another table seemed to be in the midst of forming an AI startup.

When I walked out of the coffee shop, two people passed by, talking about which AI models they were using at another company.

Then I walked across the street to meet an AI startup founder for a drink. I asked him what he thought of the Inflection AI news. I got a blank stare. It wasn’t even on his radar.

That made me think. There’s a narrative that big tech companies are going to capture the value of AI, but there are really two categories in that world right now. There’s big tech AI and there’s startup AI.

Just a couple of years ago, startups couldn’t be oblivious to big tech. Those companies were often the best exit strategy. They were also the biggest threat, squashing any startup that ventured too close. They were even the growth strategy. Facebook ads were what every startup used to acquire new users and customers.

Sure, there’s still some of that. But it does feel like AI has ushered in a new sense of possibility. That’s important, because if tech founders knew the pain and long odds of survival that were ahead of them, they probably wouldn’t try.

I decided to look at the Inflection news and other storylines in big tech through that lens in the analysis below.

Move Fast/Break Things
Handout via Intel

➚ MOVE FAST: Jackpot. Intel’s haul from U.S. grants, loans and tax breaks could grow to almost $45 billion. It already nabbed nearly $20 billion from CHIPS Act funding that was announced today as the company seeks to restore its manufacturing edge in America.

➘ BREAK THINGS: Stir the pot. The Biden administration isn’t done yet blacklisting firms linked to Huawei, which produced a smartphone made with advanced chips despite tough export controls. Now the U.S. is mulling targeting Chinese chip makers as the tech war heats up.

PostEmail
Artificial Flavor
Molly Darlington/Reuters

At a panel I moderated at SXSW on sports and technology last week, I asked Kara Nortman, owner of the Angel City Football Club, whether AI could help with strategy on the pitch. Nortman, a former tech venture capitalist, said it would be unlikely, citing football’s amorphous nature that doesn’t produce a lot of ingestible data.

Yesterday, Google DeepMind reached out about an upcoming paper on … using AI to help with football (soccer to Americans) strategy. DeepMind worked with Liverpool to develop an AI model that actually helped with corner kick strategy.

Sports teams have for decades used machine learning and big data to strategize, both on personnel decisions and strategy. But the applications were usually clear cut, relying on structured data: Player X is more likely to have a higher batting average than Player Y. Or, the probability of winning by going for it on the 4th down (in American football) changes by X percent.

We’re now entering a new era, where the advice given by computers looks more like the advice a human coach might give to players. The latest software can look at unstructured data, like video footage of corner kicks, and gain new insights. Professional sports and other games are great proving grounds for new forms of AI. It would not be surprising if teams are already experimenting with these tools in secret, hoping to gain a competitive advantage.

Google DeepMind
PostEmail
Reed Albergotti

The making of AI empires

THE SCENE

In the land grab around artificial intelligence, big technology companies are relying on old playbooks to cement and enhance their lead, which could draw greater scrutiny from Washington and Brussels.

On Monday, Bloomberg reported that Apple and Google are in talks about installing Google’s AI models on iPhones. A similar arrangement for Google search is part of a Justice Department antitrust lawsuit against Sundar Pichai’s company.

On Tuesday, Microsoft announced it was hiring Inflection AI co-founder and CEO Mustafa Suleyman and most of the company’s staff. The software giant will now offer Inflection AI models to its cloud customers and Suleyman will spearhead consumer AI products like Microsoft Copilot.

Inflection, which took a sizable investment from Microsoft, had been one of the few independent foundation model providers.

The European Commission has said it is probing Microsoft’s investment in OpenAI as a possible merger in disguise. That came after Microsoft offered to hire the entire OpenAI staff following CEO Sam Altman’s sudden firing late last year but the effort was dropped after he returned to the company.

Now, Microsoft-backed Inflection has defected to the company.

Reuters/Brendan McDermid

REED’S VIEW

AI empires have been busy this week. Microsoft’s move to simply absorb a $4 billion AI company was an incredible display of power and underscores how effective CEO Satya Nadella has been in the AI era.

Meanwhile, an Apple deal with Google would change the competitive dynamics in the AI industry in Google’s favor and could rescue Apple, which appears to have fallen behind on the technology, from the AI abyss.

There are two ways of looking at these big news stories this week. One is that the tech giants are flexing their muscles and will continue to dominate the AI era.

Only companies with massive war chests can afford to train foundation models, the most powerful AI tools that do everything from generate text to images to video.

With a first-mover advantage, foundation model providers have already gained invaluable data and know-how, propelling them far ahead and crowding out startups and competitors.

Another way of looking at this is that a massive wave of disruption is coming and the big tech companies are playing the same game in a world that’s about to be vastly different.

The original Apple-Google search deal was hashed out during secretive dinners between Apple CEO Tim Cook and Pichai, like two feudal lords trading tracts of land.

Even the creation of Inflection, a startup based on cutting edge technology, followed the familiar Silicon Valley tradition of “no conflict, no interest.”

Microsoft was the biggest investor in Inflection, which raised over $1 billion from people like Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates. Reid Hoffman, Inflection’s co-founder, is on Microsoft’s board. Inflection’s new CEO, Sean White, is a longtime friend of Hoffman’s and has worked at Hoffman’s venture firm, Greylock.

These companies know how to win today. They may not be set up for victory tomorrow.

Check out Reed's breakdown of the AI landscape for each big tech company. →

PostEmail
Obsessions
Nvidia

There’s talk of Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang being “Swiftified” this week after a packed house watched him unveil the company’s new Blackwell platform, a line of AI chips that blows previous benchmarks out of the water.

Yes, Huang is a rock star. But among game developers, which are hosting a conference now in San Francisco, Huang has been a huge celebrity for many years.

Nvidia’s new, most powerful chip contains 208 billion transistors. The Apollo guidance system used in the space program had 12,300 transistors. The story of AI has really been one of massive increases in compute power and Nvidia is leading that charge.

Huang said Nvidia needed to bend the laws of physics to build this chip. Soon, we’ll start to see what impact that has on the capabilities of AI models.

PostEmail
Watchdogs

The U.S. Attorney’s office in San Francisco is putting startups on notice. Ismail Ramsey, the top federal prosecutor for California’s Northern District, told Reuters that his office is targeting AI ventures that mislead investors before they go public. “As with any such emerging technologies, AI is fertile ground for fraudsters to make false and exaggerated claims,” he said.

His comments come after the Securities and Exchange Commission slapped a total of $400,000 in penalties on two investment advisers for their AI false claims. Agency Chair Gary Gensler called their misleading marketing “AI washing.” Adding to the regulatory pile-on is the Federal Trade Commission, which is investigating Reddit’s $60 million deal to license its content to train other firms’ AI models.

PostEmail
What We’re Tracking
DARPA/Screenshot via YouTube

The Pentagon’s R&D arm is ready to share its tools for countering deepfakes, which use techniques to verify manipulated images, video, and text. As part of the rollout, DARPA is calling on partners in academia and the private sector to commercialize its technology, it announced last week. In a bid to speed up that effort, DARPA released a catalog of open-source technologies for detecting deepfakes, and is pushing an effort to create machine learning models to detect AI-generated images.

One technique DARPA developed detects AI-generated videos. “Anyone who has an online presence up above about an hour of video is vulnerable to deepfakes in terms of video manipulation,” Dr. Wil Corvey, DARPA’s Semantic Forensics program manager, told Semafor. But by making a biometric model of facial movements and head tilts, DARPA has been able to identify manipulated videos. In tandem with other tools, such as tests that detect a heartbeat in a video, the likelihood of ferreting out AI-generated content improves, Corvey said.

Although DARPA focuses more on fundamental research than developing tools for the Pentagon, the ones being built by Semantic Forensics could be of use to the U.S. intelligence community. The Pentagon has already had to deal with viral fake images showing an explosion at the building, while experts have warned that deepfakes may become good enough to make life difficult even for military analysts. “We have benefited very much from sustained engagement from the DoD, and in some cases from prototyping very closely with them,” Corvey said.

— Mathias Hammer

PostEmail
Hot on Semafor
PostEmail