Brendan McDermid/Reuters In the immediate aftermath of Saturday’s attempted assassination of Donald Trump, national media outlets sprang into action to cover the misinformation and disinformation spreading across social media. Social media companies then sprang into action to label this content as such, or take it down. I have some bad news for those efforts. I was exposed to raw misinformation without any labels. Before I had a chance to read anything about the shooting, I received a text message from a trustworthy, highly educated person who had already come up with a theory on why the whole thing had been faked. It HAD to be an exploding ketchup packet hidden behind his ear, or something. Inventing wild conspiracy theories about assassinations is a national pastime that goes back at least 60 years to the death of President John F. Kennedy, long before algorithms could spread them. I have always wondered who we’re trying to protect by playing whack-a-mole with online disinformation — those who believe the crazy things they read or those who don’t. When warning labels are slapped on wild theories on the internet, the camp that actually believes them will likely assume those safeguards are part of the conspiracy and disregard accordingly. Is it time we move past the denial phase of social media and move on to acceptance? Of course, content harmful to children and other obvious red lines like terrorist postings should be taken down. But fighting misinformation seems like a losing battle. |