THE SCOOP U.S. Department of Justice officials are considering fraud charges against crypto exchange Binance, but are concerned about the cost to consumers, according to people familiar with the matter. Federal prosecutors worry that if they indict Binance, it could cause a run on the exchange similar to the one that befell now bankrupt platform FTX, causing consumers to lose their money and potentially spurring a panic in the crypto markets, the people said. Prosecutors are considering other options, such as fines and deferred or non-prosecution agreements, according to the people. That outcome would be a compromise, holding Binance responsible for alleged criminal behavior while reducing consumer harm. The debate highlights the complicated and rapidly evolving nature of crypto enforcement and regulation in the U.S., where firms operate in a legal gray area and consumers enjoy none of the protections of the traditional banking system. The DOJ declined to comment. Binance didn’t respond to a request for comment. Reuters/Dado RuvicREED’S VIEW The DOJ often weighs the effects on innocent consumers, employees, and shareholders when considering whether to bring indictments against big entities. That’s been the case since Arthur Andersen two decades ago. The question is whether those factors should play a role when it comes to a crypto exchange that operates in a legal gray area. People who trade crypto on Bianance and were allegedly defrauded by the company’s tactics should’ve known they were taking a bigger risk than they would have on regulated exchanges. In order to access Binance.com, U.S. citizens need to use a VPN or some other tool to circumvent restrictions. But that hardly makes Binance’s customers complicit in the company’s alleged misdeeds. Crypto is a mainstream part of the financial system now. The fact that the DOJ is debating the effects an indictment could have on consumers is, in a way, a nod to the legitimacy of crypto. For Room for Disagreement and the rest of the story, read here. |