• D.C.
  • BXL
  • Lagos
  • Dubai
  • Beijing
  • SG
rotating globe
  • D.C.
  • BXL
  • Lagos
Semafor Logo
  • Dubai
  • Beijing
  • SG


In today’s edition, we have a scoop on Schmidt’s efforts to attract top talent from academia and tec͏‌  ͏‌  ͏‌  ͏‌  ͏‌  ͏‌ 
 
rotating globe
August 16, 2023
semafor

Technology

Technology
Sign up for our free newsletters
 
Reed Albergotti
Reed Albergotti

Hi, and welcome back to Semafor Tech.

Before ChatGPT, I had a thesis about covering artificial intelligence. I thought AI was going to change the way we live and work, but nobody would notice, or really care. That’s because all of the world-changing implementations of AI were not really consumer-facing. For example, not many are awed by the way AI is optimizing the energy grid or getting their packages to arrive on time. (Some people think those things shouldn’t be called “AI” at all.)

Biotech and the sciences are probably the best examples of how AI hype has lagged actual progress. In that area, AI has been a transformative technology for many years. In fact, people in biotech roll their eyes at the large language model hype, because they’ve been living and breathing this stuff for so long.

But now everyone else is, too. ChatGPT’s greatest impact on the world so far may be its influence on the public consciousness around AI. And that matters, because money and, more importantly, talent, follow the excitement. Today, I have a scoop about Eric Schmidt’s new endeavor to bring scientific researchers and AI experts under one umbrella in an ambitious effort to make major breakthroughs. I’m not sure if I’d be writing about it if ChatGPT hadn’t shifted the conversation.

I’m not saying Schmidt is chasing the hype. He’s been investing in these kinds of areas for years. But the attention will make the initiative more successful. More people will want to fund it and more talent will be interested in joining.

We talk a lot about “troughs of disillusionment” in this industry. But AI is past the hype cycle. It is its own ocean now, with lots of troughs and crests.

Move Fast/Break Things

➚ MOVE FAST: Relocating. Israeli startup founders are voting with their feet. Amid ongoing political turmoil at home, more entrepreneurs are leaving the country and incorporating new businesses in the U.S. this year compared to 2022.

➘ BREAK THINGS: Dealmaking. Speaking of Israel’s tech sector, Intel dropped its $5.4 billion bid for contract chipmaker Tower after it failed to get regulatory approval from China. Intel will pay the Israeli firm a $353 million termination fee — collateral damage in an era of heightened Washington-Beijing tensions.

Reuters/Amir Cohen
PostEmail
Semafor Stat

Percentage of essays written by international students that were incorrectly labeled as AI-generated, according to a new study. Researchers from Stanford University looked at seven computer programs designed to automatically assess whether students are using tools like ChatGPT to cheat. They concluded the classifiers “​​exhibit significant bias against non-native English authors.” That could become a thorny problem as the second post-ChatGPT school year begins in the Northern Hemisphere.

PostEmail
Reed Albergotti

Ex-Google CEO to launch AI-science moonshot

THE SCOOP

Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt is building an ambitious new organization to tackle scientific challenges with the help of artificial intelligence, according to people briefed on the plans.

Schmidt has already hired two accomplished scientists to spearhead the nonprofit initiative: Samuel Rodriques, founder of the Applied Biotechnology Laboratory at the Francis Crick Institute; and Andrew White, a University of Rochester professor and a pioneer in the use of artificial intelligence in chemistry.

People familiar with the plans say the effort is modeled after OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, which was founded with great fanfare as a philanthropic organization.

Schmidt wants the new nonprofit to become a big draw for top talent in science and AI, two areas that are converging to potentially create breakthroughs in everything from drug discovery to material sciences. Funding will come mostly from Schmidt’s personal wealth, but outside funds may be necessary given the ambition of the project, people familiar with the plans said.

Schmidt intends to offer competitive salaries and resources, in particular compute power that can be difficult to come by in academia. The project is still in the early stages, the people said, and exact plans could change.

Spokespeople for Schmidt declined to comment. Rodriques and White did not respond to requests for comment.

Getty Images/Lukas Schulze/Sportsfile for Collision

REED’S VIEW

Schmidt’s new venture has a lot to do with talent. The great minds in science and biology are scattered all over academia and the private sector. Schmidt wants to bring together a substantive number of them in the same place.

While the plan is to build a nonprofit, the organization could presumably develop valuable intellectual property or spin off startups, much like academic labs. In the case of OpenAI, the nonprofit essentially became a for-profit.

The move reflects a shift that is happening in Silicon Valley. For decades, the most interesting thing in the tech industry was the internet and all of the businesses built around it. And the dominant method of financing the internet was advertising.

The targeted ads and the massive wealth created were so compelling that the mainstream press and most venture capitalists have kind of forgotten about actual science and technology.

But that’s starting to change. The artificial intelligence tactics that more effectively matched ads to consumers have grown so powerful that they can now possibly be used to save lives or fight climate change. And that’s a lot more interesting.

For Room for Disagreement and the rest of the story, read here.

PostEmail
China Window

Scientific collaboration between the U.S. and China could soon get even harder, further hampering progress in important areas like biotechnology, clean energy, and telecommunications, reports the Wall Street Journal. After the two countries normalized relations in 1978, they signed a bilateral agreement to work together on science and technology, which was routinely renewed. But now, American lawmakers like Mike Gallagher, who chairs a new House select committee on China, are pushing to let it expire.

That would make a slow-moving disaster even worse. Research ties between the U.S. and China have been decaying for at least five years, and America is already paying the price for it. Fewer top scientists from China now want to work and study in the U.S., where they may be viewed with heightened suspicion and subject to immigration rules their peers are not. Instead, they’re going to places like Saudi Arabia and building AI tools that will compete with technology from U.S. firms, as the Financial Times reported this week.

Louise

PostEmail
Watchdogs

Reuters/Dado Ruvic

As part of a more low-profile antitrust push by the U.S. Justice Department, two board directors at Pinterest have stepped down from similar roles at neighborhood app Nextdoor because the agency considers them rivals. It’s part of the DOJ’s efforts over the last few years to enforce a provision prohibiting what’s known as interlocking directorates. In 2021, concerns about the same rule spurred Ari Emanuel, CEO of the entertainment agency Endeavor, and company president Mark Shapiro to relinquish their board seats at concert giant Live Nation.

PostEmail
One Good Text

Matt Sheehan is a fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, where his research covers global technology issues with a focus on China.

PostEmail
Hot On Semafor
  • The cost of peace to end a civil war at one of Wall Street’s hottest firms? $34 million a year.
  • Automated content moderation has long been a holy grail of the tech industry. Has OpenAI finally solved a vexing problem for AI chatbot purveyors?
  • Why the Georgia RICO case could be dangerous for Trump — and tricky for prosecutors.
PostEmail